WASHINGTON -
WASHINGTON (AP) - Sharpening the choice for the nation,
President Barack Obama and Republican presidential challenger Mitt
Romney are offering dueling visions of how to fix the economy,
framing in their most direct terms the fierce debate that will
decide the November election. In a flash of campaign drama, the two
are giving major speeches at nearly the same time Thursday from the
same state, battleground Ohio.
For the president, Thursday's speech will aim to get above the
daily ups and downs - more downs of late - and pull the American
people into the discussion Obama wants: a choice between his
economic ideas and Romney's. As he has done before at pivotal
moments in his presidency, Obama will use a big speech to try to
reframe the debate as he heads into the heart of the campaign
calendar.
For Romney, the occasion is about offering definition to a
divided public about how he would lead the economy, including the
priorities for his first 100 days in office. The former
Massachusetts governor who made a fortune in business is sensing
momentum on his side, particularly as the weak pace of job growth
undermines Obama's stick-with-me message.
The split-screen economic addresses offer the air of a bigger
moment in a general election campaign that has been defined mainly
by ads, fundraisers and monthly jobs reports. Yet for all the
emerging hype, particularly surrounding the speech of the sitting
president, previews from both sides point toward plenty of familiar
themes and few, if any, new ideas.
Obama is not expected to announce any major economic policies.
His aides say his pending jobs ideas before Congress remain valid
and he will keep pushing them.
The two men will essentially be posting up on each other from
250 miles apart, with Obama at a community college in Cleveland and
Romney at a manufacturing company in Cincinnati. In choosing Ohio,
they are targeting the state that strategists in both parties
consider perhaps the most contested and vital of the election.
Obama will probably pound on the second-term economic vision he
began laying out months ago. He will lay out a jobs plan of
spending tax money on education, energy, science and innovation and
transportation; cutting the debt by reducing spending elsewhere and
raising taxes on the wealthy; and taking on the nation's
loophole-loaded tax code to make it fairer.
Romney will talk about cutting regulation and spending,
overhauling the tax system, doing away with Obama's health care
overhaul and supporting a major oil pipeline known as Keystone XL.
Setting his own expectations for Obama, Romney told donors in
Cincinnati: "He'll speak with great rhetoric and eloquence. But
actions and records speak a heck of a lot louder than words."
Without doubt, Romney and Obama have starkly different visions
of economic rebirth, the issue of top concern for voters. To hear
them tell it, Obama thinks Romney's jobs philosophy is a failed
notion of just cutting taxes and gutting regulation, while Romney
says the president is a big-government defender who is stifling the
free market at the cost of economic acceleration.
Of the two, Obama is carrying more of a political burden
because, as the guy in charge, he is saddled with a lumbering
economic recovery. Romney can largely blame the incumbent - just as
Obama, as a candidate, benefited from blaming President George W.
Bush.
Obama has sought to erode that argument and dent Romney's
business credentials by saying his only idea is faulting Obama.
The speeches come in a month marked by bad economic news. May
employment numbers showed that the private sector created a
disappointing 69,000 jobs and that the jobless rate ticked up to
8.2 percent. This week, the Federal Reserve released data showing
that the median family net worth shrank between 2007 and 2010 to
levels not seen since 1992.
No matter what path either candidate takes to reach the
necessary 270 electoral votes needed to win the presidency, Ohio
and its 18 electoral votes figure in every scenario. No Republican
has ever won the presidency without winning Ohio. Obama carried the
state 52 percent to 47 percent in 2008 over John McCain; Bush
carried it 51 percent to 49 percent in 2004 over Democrat John
Kerry.